3 Types of Conversations Leaders Use

Leadership-ConversationsLeaders commonly rely on two types of conversations: telling and selling.

When telling, they try to clearly specify what employees need to do (Level I). When selling, they try to persuade them with reasons for doing it (Level II). Unfortunately, some leaders resort to yelling andrepeating themselves, and they wonder why they never get the results they want.

Employees may understand “what” to do and even “why” they should do it. But they’ll never fully engage unless they’re part of meaningful conversations that encourage connection, sharing and discovery (Level III).

When we respect others’ worldviews (especially when they differ from our own), we create a space for better conversations and encourage new ideas to emerge.

The following table offers a graphic representation of Judith E. Glaser’s  three levels of identified conversations:


Conversation as a Power Dance

Too often, we get stuck in Level II conversations because we’re addicted to being right. We fail to realize the negative impact this has on others. We may start out with an exchange of ideas, but we then become trapped in a power dance.

It can be hard to let go of the need to win, but it’s critical to take this step to avoid interactions that are merely a contest of wills.

Only when we participate in Level III conversations can we transform ourselves and our conversation partners by sharing thoughts, ideas and belief systems. When we’re mindful of our intentions and notice the impact our words have on others, we begin to live in Level III. We realize that:

  • We shape the meanings our words have on others.
  • We need to validate our words’ true meanings.
  • Breakdowns occur when others interpret our words in unanticipated ways.
  • Breakdowns occur when we try to persuade others that our meanings are the right ones.
  • Breakthroughs occur when we take time to share and discover.
  • Breakthroughs occur when we co-create and partner to create a shared reality.

In the work I do coaching, people often get confused when their messages are misinterpreted. They think they are being clear, but they fail to check or validate what’s been understood, and so they leave themselves wide open for surprises.

How can you avoid this? How can you engage in Level III conversations? I’d love to hear your thoughts on this, leave me a comment.

This entry was posted in collaboration, communication, leadership and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>