Connect with Me
Scholz Leadership Development: What We Do
Subscribe to Leader Snips, the Blog by Email
-
RSS Links
About Me
Chip Scholz
Head CoachChip Scholz is Head Coach of Scholz and Associates, Inc. He is a nationally recognized executive coach, public speaker and author. He is a Certified Business Coach and works with CEO’s, business owners and sales professionals across North America.
Chip has written for a number of business and trade publications. 2009 saw the release of his first book project, “Masterminds Unleashed: Selling for Geniuses.” His second book, with co-authors Sue Nielsen and Tracy Lunquist, “Do Eagles Just Wing It?” was published in 2011. His next book "Clear Conduct" is due in 2013.Do Eagles Just Wing It?
Buy a copy of Do Eagles Just Wing It? here!
Masterminds Unleashed: Selling for Geniuses
Buy a copy of Masterminds Unleashed: Selling for Geniuses here!
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Wishwallca on Top 10 Sites to Track your Goals Online
- Ten Things: Building Your Executive Presence In-House | Ten Things You Need to Know as In-House Counsel® on Executive Presence: The Trust Factor
- Victor Crain on A 65-Year-Old Thanksgiving Message for Today’s World
- Jay Jorgenson on 10 Reasons for Managers to
Use Coaching Conversations - Attilio on Be a Courageous Leader:
Overcome Your Fears
Categories
Archives
- September 2021
- July 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
Emotions vs Rational Logic: Which Comes First?
In 2002, the Nobel Prize for economics was awarded to psychology professor, Daniel Kahneman, whose studies proved behyond any doubt that we behave emotionally first, rationally second.
Kahneman’s Prospect Theory and the work he did with Amos Tversky on judgment and decision-making have revolutionized the way we see people make decisions, and how we see leaders fail to guide companies with good judgment.
Deal or No Deal is a popular TV game show that shows dramatic evidence of the role of emotions in making decisions. It’s entertaining because the vast majority of contestants don’t make decisions based on mathematical probabilities. And we can see their folly, their arrogance, or their cautiousness manifest itself.
The game shows that people can be fooled by their emotional brain. Contestants make terrible choices, rejecting deals that they should accept. They lose fortunes because they trust their emotions at the wrong moment.
Researchers who have studied people on the show conclude that it’s almost designed to be an economics experiment.
Which makes me think about CEO decision making. How easily we are fooled by our emotions. When people make a decision that leads to a loss, they can’t help but be influenced by their emotions. In some cases, they throw good money after bad.
When decisions pay-off, and there’s a win, feelings are high, and leaders are more likely to feel lucky and want to extend their streak.
Decisions are influenced by words. A choice phrased in negative terms, suggesting loss, is less likely to be chosen than one phrased in terms of percentage chance of gain. When possible outcomes are stated in terms of loss, decision-makers will avoid that choice even if it means they risk losing everything.
This is called loss aversion, first demonstrated in the late 70s by Kahneman and Tversky and it illuminates one of many of the brain’s hard-wired defects.
Individuals don’t carefully evaluate information, nor do they compute probabilities, nor do they even think much at all, when it comes to deciding. Instead, the brain uses shortcuts, heuristics and instincts.
If given a choice, the brain would prefer skipping the caloric-intense work of thinking and skip right on over to coin-flipping or gut feelings. It burns up a tremendous amount of energy to put the brain through the rational decision making process.
Loss aversion is an innate flaw and we are all vulnerable to it. It’s part of a larger psychological phenomenon known as negativity bias which means that for the human mind, bad is stronger than good. The only way to avoid loss aversion is to know about it, and to avoid the consequences of making decisions without being aware of it.
Think about the most recent decision you had to make. What did you think about most, gain or loss? Risk or reward? Pain or pleasure? …or did you convince yourself you made your decision based solely on logic and rational options?
No related posts.